If you dislike a sponsor, you might not realize you're exactly who they're trying to reach.
When Brands You Dislike Sponsor Content You Love
The uncomfortable truth about brand alignment
Ever caught yourself enjoying a podcast or video, then grimacing when a sponsor pops up? Maybe it’s a crypto app you don’t trust, or a snack brand you’d never touch. You think, “Why this ad?” But here’s the thing: that ad isn’t random. It’s there because data says *you* might buy.
That’s the dissonance we don’t talk about enough—consuming content we admire, while ignoring the signals that come with it. Especially in business media, it’s not just the story that matters. It’s the subtext: who’s paying for your attention?
You’re part of the product
Sponsorships are the clearest sign of who a brand believes its buyers are. Brands don’t throw money around lightly. They ask: “Does this audience match our target customer?” If the answer is yes, the check gets written.
So, if a product you dislike shows up in your favorite podcast, maybe you’re closer to their market than you think. Maybe you're not their ideal customer, but you're in the neighborhood.
And this isn't just about taste. It's also about trust, values, and buying power. Brands align with creators who reach the people they want to influence. So if those brands keep showing up, they probably believe you’re listening—and might eventually convert.
Real example: The finance podcast paradox
I listen to a few finance shows. Smart hosts, sharp commentary. But I kept noticing something odd: aggressive investment apps, high-fee trading platforms, or debt relief services sponsoring those episodes. Stuff I’d never recommend.
At first I blamed the creators. But then I realized—these brands weren’t dumb. They were targeting *me*. A financially literate, risk-aware, investing professional. They wanted to normalize their product in circles that might otherwise reject them.
That realization changed how I saw the show. I didn’t stop listening, but I got more intentional. I asked: do I want to support this ecosystem? Do I want to associate with this tone, this world, this narrative?
The business angle: this matters for your brand too
If you’re a founder, CMO, or even a CFO, sponsorship alignment isn’t just someone else’s problem. It’s part of your brand story. Who you pay to promote you says a lot about your values and target audience.
We’ve rejected sponsorship deals at our company—even lucrative ones—because they didn’t align. We’ve also said yes to small partnerships that told the right story. Not perfect choices, but conscious ones.
Ask yourself a few questions:
- What does this sponsorship say about us?
- Would our best customers respect this alignment?
- Are we chasing reach, or building trust?
Content consumption is a choice
None of this means you have to cancel your favorite creators. But it does mean you should pay attention. Sponsorships are a mirror, not just a noise.
If you're always seeing brands you’d never use—or actively dislike—it might be time to rethink what you consume. Because the more time and attention you give that content, the more demand it generates. And the more similar sponsors you’ll see.
Better alignment, better outcomes
If you care about what you support—and I think most thoughtful professionals do—then be as intentional with your content as you are with your calendar or budget.
Follow creators who work with brands you respect. Support newsletters that don’t chase the highest bidder. Give your attention to voices that protect their platform, even when the money’s tempting.
In the end, your attention is currency. Spend it like it matters.
Book recommendation
“The Attention Merchants” by Tim Wu—A sharp, historical look at how companies monetize our focus. Helps put modern sponsorships in context without preaching.
What do you think?
Ever found yourself cringing at a sponsor? Did it change how you saw the content—or yourself? I’d love to hear how you handle these moments.
0 Comments